<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Breast cancer mandate proposal is example of irresponsible government</title> <atom:link href="http://ifawebnews.com/2010/02/08/breast-cancer-mandate-proposal-is-example-of-irresponsible-government/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://ifawebnews.com/2010/02/08/breast-cancer-mandate-proposal-is-example-of-irresponsible-government/</link> <description>The nation’s homepage for insurance industry news</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 14:28:41 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Tony Ondrusek</title><link>http://ifawebnews.com/2010/02/08/breast-cancer-mandate-proposal-is-example-of-irresponsible-government/comment-page-1/#comment-2036</link> <dc:creator>Tony Ondrusek</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 16:03:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ifawebnews.com/?p=12042#comment-2036</guid> <description>Point made, Del. Stifler. With respect, however, I must ask, if the mandate is already there, why go through the time, and the taxpayer cost, to create another law to say the first law should remain?
If the American Cancer Society changes its guidelines, then it would be appropriate to revisit the issue at that time. But nothing anyone has said -- including nothing from the ACS -- would lead anyone to believe they would pull a stunt such as that. It is counter to their mission. They even said so.
This bill -- while seeming to have good intentions -- is a waste of the legislature&#039;s time and taxpayer money.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Point made, Del. Stifler. With respect, however, I must ask, if the mandate is already there, why go through the time, and the taxpayer cost, to create another law to say the first law should remain?<br
/> If the American Cancer Society changes its guidelines, then it would be appropriate to revisit the issue at that time. But nothing anyone has said &#8212; including nothing from the ACS &#8212; would lead anyone to believe they would pull a stunt such as that. It is counter to their mission. They even said so.<br
/> This bill &#8212; while seeming to have good intentions &#8212; is a waste of the legislature&#8217;s time and taxpayer money.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Delegate Donna Stifler</title><link>http://ifawebnews.com/2010/02/08/breast-cancer-mandate-proposal-is-example-of-irresponsible-government/comment-page-1/#comment-2022</link> <dc:creator>Delegate Donna Stifler</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 23:23:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ifawebnews.com/?p=12042#comment-2022</guid> <description>It&#039;s already mandated by law.  Passed last year.  Delegate Pena-Melnyk. My bill only freezes the guidelines as they exist now.  No additional mandate.  In fact, Care First supports my bill.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s already mandated by law.  Passed last year.  Delegate Pena-Melnyk. My bill only freezes the guidelines as they exist now.  No additional mandate.  In fact, Care First supports my bill.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 20/31 queries in 0.022 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via ifajshead.ifamedia.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: ifawebnews.com @ 2012-05-25 12:11:07 -->
