<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
><channel><title>IFAwebnews &#187; individual mandate</title> <atom:link href="http://ifawebnews.com/tag/individual-mandate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://ifawebnews.com</link> <description>The nation’s homepage for insurance industry news</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 14:29:10 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>Tax on medical care expenses proposed to fund U.S. health initiatives</title><link>http://ifawebnews.com/2012/04/12/tax-on-medical-care-expenses-proposed-to-fund-u-s-health-initiatives/</link> <comments>http://ifawebnews.com/2012/04/12/tax-on-medical-care-expenses-proposed-to-fund-u-s-health-initiatives/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:19:04 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Bob Graham</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Health Insurance News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[National]]></category> <category><![CDATA[New York]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Northeast]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Committee on Public Health Strategies to Improve Health]]></category> <category><![CDATA[health reform]]></category> <category><![CDATA[health tax]]></category> <category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Institute of Medicine]]></category> <category><![CDATA[medical care]]></category> <category><![CDATA[PPACA]]></category> <category><![CDATA[research]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Robert Wood Johnson Foundation]]></category> <category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ifawebnews.com/?p=29106</guid> <description><![CDATA[Medical care should be taxed as a means of increasing the money put into the “chronically underfunded public health system” in the U.S., a new report recommends.<p><a
href="http://ifawebnews.com/2012/04/12/tax-on-medical-care-expenses-proposed-to-fund-u-s-health-initiatives/">Tax on medical care expenses proposed to fund U.S. health initiatives</a> via <a
href="http://ifawebnews.com">IFAwebnews</a>.</p> ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://ifawebnews.com/2012/04/12/tax-on-medical-care-expenses-proposed-to-fund-u-s-health-initiatives/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Virginia attorney general doubts survival of federal health reform</title><link>http://ifawebnews.com/2012/04/03/virginia-attorney-general-doubts-survival-of-federal-health-reform/</link> <comments>http://ifawebnews.com/2012/04/03/virginia-attorney-general-doubts-survival-of-federal-health-reform/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 17:04:33 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Jaime L. Brockway</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Health Insurance News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Mid-Atlantic]]></category> <category><![CDATA[National]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category> <category><![CDATA[guaranteed issue]]></category> <category><![CDATA[health reform]]></category> <category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Kenneth Cuccinelli]]></category> <category><![CDATA[PPACA]]></category> <category><![CDATA[u.s. supreme court]]></category> <category><![CDATA[VA]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Virginia General Assembly]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ifawebnews.com/?p=29002</guid> <description><![CDATA[Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli says that U.S. Supreme Court arguments about the federal health reform law show him that two major provisions of the reform may be cut, thereby making a new law necessary.<p><a
href="http://ifawebnews.com/2012/04/03/virginia-attorney-general-doubts-survival-of-federal-health-reform/">Virginia attorney general doubts survival of federal health reform</a> via <a
href="http://ifawebnews.com">IFAwebnews</a>.</p> ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://ifawebnews.com/2012/04/03/virginia-attorney-general-doubts-survival-of-federal-health-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Supreme Court explores health reform law without individual mandate</title><link>http://ifawebnews.com/2012/03/28/supreme-court-explores-health-reform-law-without-individual-mandate/</link> <comments>http://ifawebnews.com/2012/03/28/supreme-court-explores-health-reform-law-without-individual-mandate/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:41:38 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Bob Graham</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Health Insurance News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[National]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Antonin Scalia]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ben Nelson]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Elena Kagan]]></category> <category><![CDATA[health reform]]></category> <category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Paul Clement]]></category> <category><![CDATA[PPACA]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ruth Bader Ginsberg]]></category> <category><![CDATA[u.s. supreme court]]></category> <category><![CDATA[UT]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ifawebnews.com/?p=28949</guid> <description><![CDATA[The U.S. Supreme Court continued to question the federal health reform law, raising questions today (March 28) about whether the law can function if segments it might consider unconstitutional were to fall.<p><a
href="http://ifawebnews.com/2012/03/28/supreme-court-explores-health-reform-law-without-individual-mandate/">Supreme Court explores health reform law without individual mandate</a> via <a
href="http://ifawebnews.com">IFAwebnews</a>.</p> ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://ifawebnews.com/2012/03/28/supreme-court-explores-health-reform-law-without-individual-mandate/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Justice Kennedy, others re-ignite torch for single-payer health care</title><link>http://ifawebnews.com/2012/03/28/justice-kennedy-others-re-ignite-torch-for-single-payer-health-care/</link> <comments>http://ifawebnews.com/2012/03/28/justice-kennedy-others-re-ignite-torch-for-single-payer-health-care/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:09:15 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Bob Graham</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Trade Talk]]></category> <category><![CDATA[2008]]></category> <category><![CDATA[2009]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Anthony Kennedy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category> <category><![CDATA[health care costs]]></category> <category><![CDATA[health reform]]></category> <category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category> <category><![CDATA[PPACA]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category> <category><![CDATA[single-payer system]]></category> <category><![CDATA[u.s. supreme court]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ifawebnews.com/?p=28915</guid> <description><![CDATA[If you believe the theory that a single-payer system of health insurance is the ultimate goal of the Obama Administration and Democrats, then March 27 might prove an important day.<p><a
href="http://ifawebnews.com/2012/03/28/justice-kennedy-others-re-ignite-torch-for-single-payer-health-care/">Justice Kennedy, others re-ignite torch for single-payer health care</a> via <a
href="http://ifawebnews.com">IFAwebnews</a>.</p> ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://ifawebnews.com/2012/03/28/justice-kennedy-others-re-ignite-torch-for-single-payer-health-care/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Supreme Court justices pick at health reform&#8217;s individual mandate</title><link>http://ifawebnews.com/2012/03/27/supreme-court-justices-pick-at-health-reforms-individual-mandate/</link> <comments>http://ifawebnews.com/2012/03/27/supreme-court-justices-pick-at-health-reforms-individual-mandate/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 21:13:36 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Bob Graham</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Health Insurance News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[National]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Anthony Kennedy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Antonin Scalia]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Clarence Thomas]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Commerce Clause]]></category> <category><![CDATA[health reform. U.S. Supreme Court]]></category> <category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category> <category><![CDATA[John Roberts]]></category> <category><![CDATA[NFIB]]></category> <category><![CDATA[PPACA]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Samuel Alito]]></category> <category><![CDATA[U.S. Constitution]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ifawebnews.com/?p=28903</guid> <description><![CDATA[The two justices who may be the linchpin in whether the federal health reform is deemed constitutional joined another pair of justices appointed by Republicans to probe whether Congress overstepped its authority with the individual mandate to buy insurance.<p><a
href="http://ifawebnews.com/2012/03/27/supreme-court-justices-pick-at-health-reforms-individual-mandate/">Supreme Court justices pick at health reform&#8217;s individual mandate</a> via <a
href="http://ifawebnews.com">IFAwebnews</a>.</p> ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://ifawebnews.com/2012/03/27/supreme-court-justices-pick-at-health-reforms-individual-mandate/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>In Supreme Court, both sides agree on one part in health reform debate</title><link>http://ifawebnews.com/2012/03/26/in-supreme-court-both-sides-agree-on-one-part-in-health-reform-debate/</link> <comments>http://ifawebnews.com/2012/03/26/in-supreme-court-both-sides-agree-on-one-part-in-health-reform-debate/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 18:40:24 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Bob Graham</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Health Insurance News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[National]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Anti-Injunction Act]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Commerce Clause]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category> <category><![CDATA[fee]]></category> <category><![CDATA[General Donald B. Verrilli Jr.]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Gregory G. Katsas]]></category> <category><![CDATA[health reform]]></category> <category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Obama Administration]]></category> <category><![CDATA[PPACA]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Samuel A. Alito Jr.]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Stephen G. Breyer]]></category> <category><![CDATA[tax]]></category> <category><![CDATA[U.S. Constitution]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ifawebnews.com/?p=28877</guid> <description><![CDATA[Both sides in the argument over the constitutionality of the federal health reform law agreed on one thing at the first hearing before the U.S. Supreme Court: that the justices can rule this year.<p><a
href="http://ifawebnews.com/2012/03/26/in-supreme-court-both-sides-agree-on-one-part-in-health-reform-debate/">In Supreme Court, both sides agree on one part in health reform debate</a> via <a
href="http://ifawebnews.com">IFAwebnews</a>.</p> ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://ifawebnews.com/2012/03/26/in-supreme-court-both-sides-agree-on-one-part-in-health-reform-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Two years later, Obama health reform law fuels instability, questions</title><link>http://ifawebnews.com/2012/03/23/two-years-later-obama-health-reform-law-fuels-instability-questions/</link> <comments>http://ifawebnews.com/2012/03/23/two-years-later-obama-health-reform-law-fuels-instability-questions/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 11:51:53 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Bob Graham</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Health Insurance News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Maryland]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Mid-Atlantic]]></category> <category><![CDATA[National]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category> <category><![CDATA[2012 elections]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category> <category><![CDATA[blue cross blue shield]]></category> <category><![CDATA[CareFirst]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Chet Burrell]]></category> <category><![CDATA[DC]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category> <category><![CDATA[GAO]]></category> <category><![CDATA[health exchanges]]></category> <category><![CDATA[health insurers]]></category> <category><![CDATA[health reform]]></category> <category><![CDATA[HHS]]></category> <category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category> <category><![CDATA[MD]]></category> <category><![CDATA[MLRs]]></category> <category><![CDATA[PPACA]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category> <category><![CDATA[small-group market]]></category> <category><![CDATA[VA]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ifawebnews.com/?p=28836</guid> <description><![CDATA[The federal health reform law, a landmark piece of legislation passed by the Democratic-controlled Congress and President Barack Obama two years ago today (March 23), has delivered on its promise to change health care in the U.S.<p><a
href="http://ifawebnews.com/2012/03/23/two-years-later-obama-health-reform-law-fuels-instability-questions/">Two years later, Obama health reform law fuels instability, questions</a> via <a
href="http://ifawebnews.com">IFAwebnews</a>.</p> ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://ifawebnews.com/2012/03/23/two-years-later-obama-health-reform-law-fuels-instability-questions/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Supreme Court to release audio of health reform legal debate each day</title><link>http://ifawebnews.com/2012/03/19/supreme-court-to-release-audio-of-health-reform-legal-debate-each-day/</link> <comments>http://ifawebnews.com/2012/03/19/supreme-court-to-release-audio-of-health-reform-legal-debate-each-day/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:24:20 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Bob Graham</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Health Insurance News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[National]]></category> <category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category> <category><![CDATA[civil]]></category> <category><![CDATA[health exchanges]]></category> <category><![CDATA[health reform]]></category> <category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category> <category><![CDATA[PPACA]]></category> <category><![CDATA[u.s. supreme court]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ifawebnews.com/?p=28757</guid> <description><![CDATA[The U.S. Supreme Court will depart from its normal practice and make audio recordings of the three days of hearings on the constitutionality of the federal health reform law available each afternoon.<p><a
href="http://ifawebnews.com/2012/03/19/supreme-court-to-release-audio-of-health-reform-legal-debate-each-day/">Supreme Court to release audio of health reform legal debate each day</a> via <a
href="http://ifawebnews.com">IFAwebnews</a>.</p> ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://ifawebnews.com/2012/03/19/supreme-court-to-release-audio-of-health-reform-legal-debate-each-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>New Pa. bill rebuffs federal heath reform&#8217;s individual mandate</title><link>http://ifawebnews.com/2012/03/13/new-pa-bill-rebuffs-federal-heath-reforms-individual-mandate/</link> <comments>http://ifawebnews.com/2012/03/13/new-pa-bill-rebuffs-federal-heath-reforms-individual-mandate/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 13:26:38 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Jaime L. Brockway</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Health Insurance News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Mid-Atlantic]]></category> <category><![CDATA[National]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category> <category><![CDATA[health reform]]></category> <category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Joe Scarnati]]></category> <category><![CDATA[PA]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania General Assembly]]></category> <category><![CDATA[PPACA]]></category> <category><![CDATA[referendum]]></category> <category><![CDATA[u.s. supreme court]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ifawebnews.com/?p=28709</guid> <description><![CDATA[A Pennsylvania Senate panel approved on March 7 a proposal that would make the individual mandate provision of the federal health reform illegal in the state.<p><a
href="http://ifawebnews.com/2012/03/13/new-pa-bill-rebuffs-federal-heath-reforms-individual-mandate/">New Pa. bill rebuffs federal heath reform&#8217;s individual mandate</a> via <a
href="http://ifawebnews.com">IFAwebnews</a>.</p> ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://ifawebnews.com/2012/03/13/new-pa-bill-rebuffs-federal-heath-reforms-individual-mandate/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Group representing 119 in Congress calls individual mandate illegal</title><link>http://ifawebnews.com/2012/02/08/group-representing-119-in-congress-calls-individual-mandate-illegal/</link> <comments>http://ifawebnews.com/2012/02/08/group-representing-119-in-congress-calls-individual-mandate-illegal/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:20:46 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Bob Graham</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Health Insurance News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Maryland]]></category> <category><![CDATA[National]]></category> <category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category> <category><![CDATA[New York]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Northeast]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category> <category><![CDATA[American Center for Law and Justice]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category> <category><![CDATA[health reform]]></category> <category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category> <category><![CDATA[PPACA]]></category> <category><![CDATA[u.s. supreme court]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ifawebnews.com/?p=28351</guid> <description><![CDATA[The American Center for Law and Justice has filed a second brief with the U.S. Supreme Court, this time arguing against the individual mandate in the federal health reform law.<p><a
href="http://ifawebnews.com/2012/02/08/group-representing-119-in-congress-calls-individual-mandate-illegal/">Group representing 119 in Congress calls individual mandate illegal</a> via <a
href="http://ifawebnews.com">IFAwebnews</a>.</p> ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://ifawebnews.com/2012/02/08/group-representing-119-in-congress-calls-individual-mandate-illegal/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 31/38 queries in 0.025 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via ifajshead.ifamedia.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: ifawebnews.com @ 2012-05-26 05:00:27 -->
