<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
><channel><title>IFAwebnews &#187; state-based regulation</title> <atom:link href="http://ifawebnews.com/tag/state-based-regulation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://ifawebnews.com</link> <description>The nation’s homepage for insurance industry news</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 14:29:10 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>If we know what the NAIC is not, does that help with what it is?</title><link>http://ifawebnews.com/2012/03/27/if-we-know-what-the-naic-is-not-does-that-help-with-what-it-is/</link> <comments>http://ifawebnews.com/2012/03/27/if-we-know-what-the-naic-is-not-does-that-help-with-what-it-is/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:24:12 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>John Lobert</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Trade Talk]]></category> <category><![CDATA[CA]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ed Royce]]></category> <category><![CDATA[federal regulation]]></category> <category><![CDATA[FL]]></category> <category><![CDATA[John Lobert]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Kevin McCarty]]></category> <category><![CDATA[NAIC]]></category> <category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category> <category><![CDATA[state-based regulation]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ifawebnews.com/?p=28858</guid> <description><![CDATA[Somewhere between the time I wrote March 22 piece on the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, the group of state insurance regulators, (NAIC) and the time it was posted, the NAIC resolved one of the issues I raised: its identity.<p><a
href="http://ifawebnews.com/2012/03/27/if-we-know-what-the-naic-is-not-does-that-help-with-what-it-is/">If we know what the NAIC is not, does that help with what it is?</a> via <a
href="http://ifawebnews.com">IFAwebnews</a>.</p> ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://ifawebnews.com/2012/03/27/if-we-know-what-the-naic-is-not-does-that-help-with-what-it-is/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>6</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>As long as perception of closed door remains, NAIC&#8217;s image is tarnished</title><link>http://ifawebnews.com/2012/03/22/as-long-as-perception-of-closed-door-remains-naics-image-is-tarnished/</link> <comments>http://ifawebnews.com/2012/03/22/as-long-as-perception-of-closed-door-remains-naics-image-is-tarnished/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:25:12 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>John Lobert</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Trade Talk]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ed Royce]]></category> <category><![CDATA[federalization]]></category> <category><![CDATA[John Lobert]]></category> <category><![CDATA[NAIC]]></category> <category><![CDATA[state-based regulation]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ifawebnews.com/?p=28822</guid> <description><![CDATA[The National Association of Insurance Commissioners, the organization representing each state's insurance department, is a worthwhile venture because it serves to create uniformity in the regulation of insurance. Some moan that uniformity by a national trade association (more on that in a minute) is national insurance regulation, which is no better than federal regulation. I beg to differ.<p><a
href="http://ifawebnews.com/2012/03/22/as-long-as-perception-of-closed-door-remains-naics-image-is-tarnished/">As long as perception of closed door remains, NAIC&#8217;s image is tarnished</a> via <a
href="http://ifawebnews.com">IFAwebnews</a>.</p> ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://ifawebnews.com/2012/03/22/as-long-as-perception-of-closed-door-remains-naics-image-is-tarnished/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Rep. Royce asks NAIC to answer if it is regulatory or &#8216;private group&#8217;</title><link>http://ifawebnews.com/2012/02/29/rep-royce-asks-naic-to-answer-if-it-is-regulatory-or-private-group/</link> <comments>http://ifawebnews.com/2012/02/29/rep-royce-asks-naic-to-answer-if-it-is-regulatory-or-private-group/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:12:04 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Bob Graham</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Health Insurance News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Life Insurance News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[National]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Property-Casualty Insurance News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[South]]></category> <category><![CDATA[West]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ed Royce]]></category> <category><![CDATA[federal insurance regulation]]></category> <category><![CDATA[FL]]></category> <category><![CDATA[insurance commissioners]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Kevin McCarty]]></category> <category><![CDATA[NAIC]]></category> <category><![CDATA[state-based regulation]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Susan Voss]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Theresa Vaughn]]></category> <category><![CDATA[U.S. House Financial Services Committee]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Vanessa Sink]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ifawebnews.com/?p=28574</guid> <description><![CDATA[A congressman from California is asking the organization representing state insurance commissioners to explain what it meant last summer when it said it wanted to “to brand itself as a ‘standard-setting organization.”<p><a
href="http://ifawebnews.com/2012/02/29/rep-royce-asks-naic-to-answer-if-it-is-regulatory-or-private-group/">Rep. Royce asks NAIC to answer if it is regulatory or &#8216;private group&#8217;</a> via <a
href="http://ifawebnews.com">IFAwebnews</a>.</p> ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://ifawebnews.com/2012/02/29/rep-royce-asks-naic-to-answer-if-it-is-regulatory-or-private-group/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>NAIC must thwart questions on whether its positions are self-serving</title><link>http://ifawebnews.com/2011/08/15/naic-must-thwart-questions-on-whether-its-positions-are-self-serving/</link> <comments>http://ifawebnews.com/2011/08/15/naic-must-thwart-questions-on-whether-its-positions-are-self-serving/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 14:43:16 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Bob Graham</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Trade Talk]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category> <category><![CDATA[federal regulation]]></category> <category><![CDATA[health exchanges]]></category> <category><![CDATA[health reform]]></category> <category><![CDATA[HHS]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Kathleen Sebelius]]></category> <category><![CDATA[multi-state plans]]></category> <category><![CDATA[NAIC]]></category> <category><![CDATA[OPM]]></category> <category><![CDATA[PPACA]]></category> <category><![CDATA[state-based regulation]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ifawebnews.com/?p=26375</guid> <description><![CDATA[Each time the organization representing state insurance commissioners puts out its critique of some aspect of the federal health reform law or its proposed implementation, a key question is raised: Is the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) representing the interests of those it is serving, primarily consumers, or is it serving its own interests?<p><a
href="http://ifawebnews.com/2011/08/15/naic-must-thwart-questions-on-whether-its-positions-are-self-serving/">NAIC must thwart questions on whether its positions are self-serving</a> via <a
href="http://ifawebnews.com">IFAwebnews</a>.</p> ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://ifawebnews.com/2011/08/15/naic-must-thwart-questions-on-whether-its-positions-are-self-serving/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>NAIC: Multi-state health exchange plans could stymie competition</title><link>http://ifawebnews.com/2011/08/15/naic-multi-state-health-exchange-plans-could-stymie-competition/</link> <comments>http://ifawebnews.com/2011/08/15/naic-multi-state-health-exchange-plans-could-stymie-competition/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 14:05:44 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Bob Graham</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Health Insurance News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Midwest]]></category> <category><![CDATA[National]]></category> <category><![CDATA[health exchanges]]></category> <category><![CDATA[health reform]]></category> <category><![CDATA[multi-state plans]]></category> <category><![CDATA[NAIC]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Obama Administration]]></category> <category><![CDATA[OPM]]></category> <category><![CDATA[PPACA]]></category> <category><![CDATA[state-based regulation]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Susan Voss]]></category> <category><![CDATA[u.s. supreme court]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ifawebnews.com/?p=26370</guid> <description><![CDATA[The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) is telling federal officials that its proposal for regulating new federally mandated multi-state health insurance plans could upset state insurance markets and erode consumer protections.<p><a
href="http://ifawebnews.com/2011/08/15/naic-multi-state-health-exchange-plans-could-stymie-competition/">NAIC: Multi-state health exchange plans could stymie competition</a> via <a
href="http://ifawebnews.com">IFAwebnews</a>.</p> ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://ifawebnews.com/2011/08/15/naic-multi-state-health-exchange-plans-could-stymie-competition/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>House&#8217;s defunding of health exchanges affirms states&#8217; insurance stake</title><link>http://ifawebnews.com/2011/05/06/houses-defunding-of-health-exchanges-affirms-states-insurance-stake/</link> <comments>http://ifawebnews.com/2011/05/06/houses-defunding-of-health-exchanges-affirms-states-insurance-stake/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 14:18:05 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Bob Graham</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Health Insurance News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[National]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category> <category><![CDATA[federal regulation]]></category> <category><![CDATA[federalization]]></category> <category><![CDATA[FIO]]></category> <category><![CDATA[GAO]]></category> <category><![CDATA[health exchanges]]></category> <category><![CDATA[health reform]]></category> <category><![CDATA[HR 1213]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Leonard Brevik]]></category> <category><![CDATA[PIA]]></category> <category><![CDATA[PPACA]]></category> <category><![CDATA[state-based regulation]]></category> <category><![CDATA[U.S. House]]></category> <category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ifawebnews.com/?p=25032</guid> <description><![CDATA[An insurance trade group says the U.S. House is “moving in the right direction” toward affirming state-based insurance regulation by voting to defund health insurance exchanges.<p><a
href="http://ifawebnews.com/2011/05/06/houses-defunding-of-health-exchanges-affirms-states-insurance-stake/">House&#8217;s defunding of health exchanges affirms states&#8217; insurance stake</a> via <a
href="http://ifawebnews.com">IFAwebnews</a>.</p> ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://ifawebnews.com/2011/05/06/houses-defunding-of-health-exchanges-affirms-states-insurance-stake/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>HHS wants to force health insurers to justify all rate hikes over 10%</title><link>http://ifawebnews.com/2010/12/21/hhs-wants-to-force-health-insurers-to-justify-all-rate-hikes-over-10/</link> <comments>http://ifawebnews.com/2010/12/21/hhs-wants-to-force-health-insurers-to-justify-all-rate-hikes-over-10/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 15:50:22 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Bob Graham</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Health Insurance News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[National]]></category> <category><![CDATA[federal regulation]]></category> <category><![CDATA[health reform]]></category> <category><![CDATA[HHS]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Jay Angoff]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Kathleen Sebelius]]></category> <category><![CDATA[PPACA]]></category> <category><![CDATA[rate hikes]]></category> <category><![CDATA[rate reviews]]></category> <category><![CDATA[state-based regulation]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ifawebnews.com/?p=22364</guid> <description><![CDATA[The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services plans to force health insurance companies to justify any rate increases of 10% or more, starting next year.<p><a
href="http://ifawebnews.com/2010/12/21/hhs-wants-to-force-health-insurers-to-justify-all-rate-hikes-over-10/">HHS wants to force health insurers to justify all rate hikes over 10%</a> via <a
href="http://ifawebnews.com">IFAwebnews</a>.</p> ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://ifawebnews.com/2010/12/21/hhs-wants-to-force-health-insurers-to-justify-all-rate-hikes-over-10/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Financial services reform, with minimal tweaks for insurance, now law</title><link>http://ifawebnews.com/2010/07/21/financial-services-reform-with-minimal-tweaks-for-insurance-now-law/</link> <comments>http://ifawebnews.com/2010/07/21/financial-services-reform-with-minimal-tweaks-for-insurance-now-law/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 18:25:12 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Bob Graham</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Life Insurance News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[National]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Dodd-Frank Act]]></category> <category><![CDATA[financial services reform]]></category> <category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category> <category><![CDATA[state-based regulation]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ifawebnews.com/?p=18721</guid> <description><![CDATA[President Barack Obama signed sweeping financial services regulatory reform into law today (July 21), creating a system of oversight designed to prevent future meltdowns of the financial services industry in the U.S.<p><a
href="http://ifawebnews.com/2010/07/21/financial-services-reform-with-minimal-tweaks-for-insurance-now-law/">Financial services reform, with minimal tweaks for insurance, now law</a> via <a
href="http://ifawebnews.com">IFAwebnews</a>.</p> ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://ifawebnews.com/2010/07/21/financial-services-reform-with-minimal-tweaks-for-insurance-now-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Democrats secure votes to pass financial services reform</title><link>http://ifawebnews.com/2010/07/14/democrats-secure-votes-to-pass-financial-services-reform/</link> <comments>http://ifawebnews.com/2010/07/14/democrats-secure-votes-to-pass-financial-services-reform/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:06:24 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Bob Graham</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Life Insurance News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[National]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Northeast]]></category> <category><![CDATA[West]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Dodd-Frank law]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Federal Insurance Office]]></category> <category><![CDATA[federal regulation]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Olympia Snowe]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category> <category><![CDATA[scott brown]]></category> <category><![CDATA[state-based regulation]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Susan Collins]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ifawebnews.com/?p=18534</guid> <description><![CDATA[President Barack Obama and other Democrats say they have the 60 votes necessary to pass financial services reform legislation.<p><a
href="http://ifawebnews.com/2010/07/14/democrats-secure-votes-to-pass-financial-services-reform/">Democrats secure votes to pass financial services reform</a> via <a
href="http://ifawebnews.com">IFAwebnews</a>.</p> ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://ifawebnews.com/2010/07/14/democrats-secure-votes-to-pass-financial-services-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Senate passes reform bill; states retain insurance regulation</title><link>http://ifawebnews.com/2010/05/21/senate-passes-reform-bill-states-retain-insurance-regulation/</link> <comments>http://ifawebnews.com/2010/05/21/senate-passes-reform-bill-states-retain-insurance-regulation/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 13:41:42 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Bob Graham</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Life Insurance News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[National]]></category> <category><![CDATA[AIA]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Big I]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Charles Symington]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category> <category><![CDATA[economy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[financial reform]]></category> <category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Leigh Ann Pusey]]></category> <category><![CDATA[OFC]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Office of National Insurance]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Restoring American Financial Stability Act]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Robert Rusbuldt]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category> <category><![CDATA[state-based regulation]]></category> <category><![CDATA[U.S. Treasury]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ifawebnews.com/?p=16712</guid> <description><![CDATA[The U.S. Senate’s passage of financial services reform May 20 has drawn the praise of two insurance industry trade groups, both pleased to see that senators deemed property-casualty insurance different than other financial service sectors.<p><a
href="http://ifawebnews.com/2010/05/21/senate-passes-reform-bill-states-retain-insurance-regulation/">Senate passes reform bill; states retain insurance regulation</a> via <a
href="http://ifawebnews.com">IFAwebnews</a>.</p> ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://ifawebnews.com/2010/05/21/senate-passes-reform-bill-states-retain-insurance-regulation/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 31/38 queries in 0.024 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via ifajshead.ifamedia.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: ifawebnews.com @ 2012-05-26 16:11:01 -->
